JW Zepeda
We give discounts to all those who serve.

We welcome you with a Servant’s Heart and a Warrior’s Spirit.  Bienvenidos, Se Habla Espanol.

 

Search

Motorcycle Injuries

Motorcycle Injuries

Words from the Founder:

I remember growing up hearing my grandma tell me stories about how they had my dad on her back as she sat behind my grandpa when they would go down the road on my grandpa’s iron horse (motorcycle). 

My uncle, to this day, is a daily driver and has been his whole life. He is in his sixties now. 

When I retire, I have always said I will get a cruiser and live out of a backpack while my old lady and I explore the world cruising. 

All that to say, motorcycles have a huge place in my heart, and there are few things more American than riding down the open road on your motorbike. 

However, riding a motorcycle is one of the most dangerous things you can do, not because of what you may do wrong, but more so due to others not paying attention and seeing you on your bike. 

I know what it is like to have been in a severe accident, albeit not a motorcycle accident.

When I was a young boy, my grandpa was driving my brother and me home from a movie when out of nowhere, a truck swerved towards us and hit our van, causing it to flip and smoke. 

We all made it out of the van that day, and the van did not blow up, but we were all injured, and my brother and I were traumatized after thinking we would die in a fire or my grandpa would once we got out. 

Plus, all my life, my grandma got upset when she heard about motorcycle injuries due to another driver’s fault. She always said that it could have been my uncle.

Many law firms can take your Motorcycle injury case, but how many of them come from a family who rides and understands the life? I do.

Many lawyers can take your injury case, but how many have lived through a severe accident themselves and can use that emotion in their pursuit of victory for you? I have, and these experiences will be the fuel that drives this firm while we fight for justice for you.

Motorcycles have always been a part of my family and will always be. They hold a special place in my heart.

This firm would take your motorcycle case personally and fight for your justice the way I would fight for my family if they were injured.

Let This Firm Be Your Champion And Fight For Your Honor.

We Stand Ready To Serve.

-JW Zepeda

jw zepeda law firm about

These claims have a time limit in which they must be brought. Act now.

The information below focuses on injuries. However, if your loved one was killed due to this type of harm, click here.

Driving is the most dangerous thing most of us do every day. Here we are among these thousand-pound boxes zooming down the road, and you could be doing everything right when some careless person hits your vehicle.

personal injury law

Pursuing a Personal Injury Claim does many things:

For Example:

  • It allows much-needed finances to pay the costs associated with the injury, including medical, therapy, and equipment charges. It will enable you to support your family while you recover.
  • If you are permanently disabled, it can provide you with the means to support your family for the rest of your life.
  • It will enable setting aside money for future family expenses, schooling, and housing.
  • It helps to give you some closure and aid peace of mind.
  • And not only do you get the justice you deserve, but often you help ensure other people do not get hurt the same way.

Motorcycle injuries happen in many ways, some examples are:

For Example:

Distracted driving.

In the cell phone and mobile screens age, this cause of injury is multiplying profoundly and is a considerable danger. As the population grows and more folks grow up with a screen in their hands, distracted driving will injure or kill more people.

Speeding.

Speeding is the number one killer when it comes to vehicle injuries. With speed, big trucks or buses turn into rockets capable of massive damage and death.

Not only is going over the speed limit deadly, but going under the speed limit has proven to be almost as deadly.

Swerving in and out of lanes.

This cause is the second most killer of people in vehicle accidents, behind speeding. A Big Truck or Bus swerving or weaving in and out of traffic is a death trap waiting to spring. 

Drinking and driving.

When someone has been drinking, some get to the point where they cannot walk right, let alone use anything, especially a vehicle. So, it is no wonder why drinking and driving kill people. 

Driving on drugs.

Drugs give many people the illusion that they are in complete control even though they are high. That is why so many people use vehicles on drugs and kill others. 

Long-haul truckers or bus drivers often must stay up for hours upon hours at a time, and unfortunately, a growing number of them use drugs to keep them awake. The drug gives them the false impression of being alert, leading to killing more people.

Drivers not paying attention to people walking and biking.

Truck or bus drivers sit so high up that it is effortless to fall into the trap of not looking good enough to ensure no one is walking or biking, which the driver needs to consider. Therefore, people on foot and bikers get injured or die each day simply because a driver did not take enough time to look around before moving their Big Truck or Bus.

Tired driving or falling asleep behind the wheel.

Credible evidence shows that being tired behind the wheel can be as dangerous as drinking and driving.

A study found that people with less than 4 hours of sleep were 11.5 times more likely to be in an auto accident. (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/12/06/driving-5-hours-sleep-like-driving-drunk/94992718/)

2 out of 5 drivers admitted to nodding off behind the wheel at least once in their lifetimes. (AAA report).

According to the CDC, more than 1/3 of all Americans are not getting enough sleep.

Improper loading.

With the weight being pulled by big trucks, proper loading is critical. That is why there are rules about appropriate loading. When these rules are not followed, it can cause severe damage and death when loads fall off or trucks lose control due to improper loading.

And unfortunately, there are many more ways as well.

There are many other reasons, and unfortunately, new causes, why big trucks or buses are in accidents. Contact a law firm if you were involved in a Big Truck or Bus accident.

 

Motorcycle injuries happen in many ways, some examples are:

These injuries are primarily caused by negligence.

Negligence: Negligence is a failure to act as a prudent person would under the circumstances that causes injury or death to someone owed a duty from the wrongdoer.

 

Elements: Things that the plaintiff (the person suing) must prove to have a chance at winning.

 

Negligence Elements:

 

1. Duty: A duty of care was owed the injured party:

 

General duty of care exists anytime someone is involved in any activity that may injure another.

 

The duty calls for a person engaging in a potentially harmful activity to act as a prudent person would under similar circumstances.

 

A prudent person would take necessary precautions to protect against foreseeable injuries to another.

 

    Foreseeable means in the zone of danger. In other words, people who reasonably could be hurt by the activity.

 

The prudent person standard does not consider the wrongdoer’s characteristics to recuse them from liability except in some specific circumstances.

     For Example:

 

      The court will not hold a child to the same standard as an adult. A child’s standard of care is that of a child of like age, experience, and education, amongst other things.

 

      A professional in their field will be held to the standard of care that other reasonable professionals would practice under similar circumstances. 

 

2. Breach: A breach of the duty owed occurred:

 

Once the duty is established, the plaintiff must show that the wrongdoer (the tortfeasor) breached a duty.

 

Breaches of duty occur when the wrongdoer does not act as a prudent person would, to protect a foreseeable victim.

 

     Res Ipsa Loquitur: This means the thing speaks for itself. Res Ipsa Loquitur may be enough to satisfy the breach and causation elements.

 

Res Ipsa has two elements.

 

1. The character of the accident is such that it would only usually occur with negligence.

2. The thing causing the harm is shown to have been under the management and control of the wrongdoer. The thing causing the damage does not have to be in sole control of the wrongdoer.

         

 

3. Causation: The breach was the cause of the harm:

 

Causation is broken into two categories. Often, these categories are thought of as separate elements; however, they combine to prove causation.

 

A. Actual Causation: There are multiple tests for causation.

 

     But for: This is the most used test.

 

If you could take the wrongdoer’s action out of the situation and the harm would not have occurred, it is not the but-for cause.

 

     Concurrent causes: When multiple acts by multiple wrongdoers combine to harm the victim, the but-for test is still used. The test shows that, but for the various breaches, the injury would not have occurred.

 

When concurrent causes are found, the multiple wrongdoers will be responsible for Damages if found liable.

 

     Substantial factor test: This is used when many causes combine to cause the injury.

 

Actual causation is found here if the wrongdoer’s acts were a substantial factor in causing the harm.

 

       Res Ipsa Loquitur: This means the thing speaks for itself. Res Ipsa Loquitur may be enough to satisfy the breach and causation elements.

 

Res Ipsa has two elements.

 

1. The character of the accident is such that it would only usually occur with negligence.

2.  The thing causing the harm is shown to have been under the management and control of the wrongdoer. The thing causing the damage does not have to be in sole control of the wrongdoer.

         

B. Legal Causation: Proximate cause: This limits a wrongdoer’s liability to only foreseeable harm.

 

     Intervening forces: These actions occur after the wrongdoer’s negligent act that further injures the victim. The wrongdoer is liable for intervening forces that are foreseeable. For Example:

 

After a car accident, you are thrown from your car, and your hand gets run over by another vehicle. If the person who caused the car accident is found negligent, they are also liable for your hand.

 

     Super Intervening force: These acts further injure a victim after the wrongdoer’s negligent act. These acts are unforeseeable, so the original wrongdoer is not responsible for any injury caused by or after the super intervening forces. A super intervening force breaks the chain of causation. For Example:

 

After a car accident, you are thrown from your car, and your hand gets cut by a falling drone. Even if found negligent, the person who caused the car accident is not liable for your hand.

 

4. Damages: Damages that resulted from the breach:

 

The wrongdoer is responsible for all negligently caused Damages, even if the injuries were made worse due to a prior condition.

 

     Egg Shell Skull Doctrine states that wrongdoers take their victims as the wrongdoer finds them.

            For Example:

 

Suppose the injured person got dramatic injuries due to having a skull as sensitive as an eggshell. In that case, the wrongdoer is still responsible for the extent of all injuries.

Negligence per se: Occurs when companies or people owe duties by operation of law (this means because the law says so).

Negligence per se has two elements:

    1. A law that was meant to defend against the type of harm causing the injury and,
    2. The injured person is a member of the protected class the statute is designed to protect.

 The injury may have been a result of premise liability.

 

Premise liability: This is a negligence claim with a duty imposed on the owner or manager due to the classification of a particular person.

 

The classification is based on why or how a person is on the property.

 

Below are the legal duties demanded by owners or managers of real estate.

 

For licenses:

 

Licensees enter the property with the expressed or implied permission of the owner. Licensees are on the property for their benefit or business.

 

     One example of a licensee is a social visitor.

 

Suppose the owner knows of any dangers or risks a licensee is likely to encounter. Examples of hazards are loose boards or holes in the ground.

 

In that case, the owner must warn the licensee or make the risks safe.

 

The owner also owes the general duty of reasonable care in all active operations.

 

For invitees:

 

Invitees are on the property for their benefit and the owner’s benefit. Invitees are present due to an express or implied invitation from the owner.

 

Invitees include people entering to participate in any activity invited, including the guest or workers of those invitees.

 

     For example, A customer, a skilled laborer hired to do work, or somebody making deliveries.

 

Even those who would customarily enter the establishment, which is not there due to an invitation, are still considered invitees.

 

Customary entrants may include, for example, government workers or lien holders.

 

Invitees are due to the highest level of care.

 

Owners must warn or make safe ANY dangerous condition that the owner knew about or could have found with a reasonable inspection.

 

     For Example, A store owner would have to warn or make a long-sitting puddle of water safe on a store floor.

 

The duty to make safe or warn may not apply to apparent risks or dangers.

 

The owner also has the general duty of reasonable care in all active operations.

 

For trespassers:

 

Trespassers are those who come onto the land of another without invitation.

 

     Unknown trespassers: No duty is owed to a trespasser unknown to the owner.

 

Known “discovered” trespassers: An owner must warn or make safe any conditions made by humans known to the owner that may cause serious harm.

 

     Attractive Nuisance: This law puts a duty on property owners to warn or make safe anything that may attract a child of tender age to be a trespasser.

 

If attracted to the property, the child trespasser will not be treated as a trespasser. The child had an open invitation to be on the property in the eyes of the law.

 

The duty owed an individual may change:

 

The duty owed to a particular individual may change as their classification changes.

 

In other words, from invitee to trespasser.

 

     For Example: If a customer wanders into the back of a store, where they are not invited, they are now trespassers.

 

Negligence per se: Occurs when companies or people owe duties by operation of law (this means because the law says so). 

 

Negligence per se has two elements.

 

1. A law that was meant to defend against the type of harm causing the injury and,

2. The injured person is a member of the protected class the statute is designed to protect.

 

Inadequate security

 

This claim is brought due to a breach of the above duties owed to licensees, invitees, or discovered trespassers.

 

Inadequate security exists when an owner or manager needs to take proper measures after they know or should have known about dangerous situations.

 

     For Example: If you were assaulted, robbed, raped, or experienced any number of harms due to not being adequately secured by the owner or manager of the location, you might have a claim that requires justice.

 

Improper Security Claims involve more than not having security guards or bouncers.

 

Improper security may involve having an unreasonably unsafe environment that the owner should have warned of or made safe.

 

Even if the owner or manager took some protective measures, the owner or manager might be liable for inadequate protection or for not keeping the protective standards.

 

     For Example: Having security lights or cameras that are broken.

 

Inadequate security can occur in most places that are open to the public.

The injury may have been a result of product liability.

 

There are three ways products liability cases arise in Texas:

 

1. Manufacturing defect:

 

These defects occur when an item is not made following the manufacturing process and is dangerous beyond the expectation of the ordinary consumer.

 

These defects are not usually restricted to a single item but may involve many pieces.

 

It is very likely that when we bring a manufacturing defect claim, we are bringing you the justice you deserve and saving others from pain and suffering.

 

Company recalls on specific batch pieces are likely because an attorney filed a claim for someone like you. By filing a legal dispute, companies become aware of defects hurting people.

 

2. Design defect:

 

The design is the defect.

 

So even if the product was made correctly, it is unsafe due to a poor design.

 

These defects are not restricted to a single item. They involve all pieces made following this design.

 

It is very likely that when we bring a design defect claim, we are bringing you the justice you deserve and saving others from pain and suffering.

 

When the entire product line is recalled, not just a certain number of pieces, it is likely due to a design defect.

 

3. Failure to warn of defects:

 

Even though there are no defects, some products may still be dangerous when misused or used correctly.

 

When companies know or should know that a product has dangers that are not obvious if appropriately used, they must warn of the hidden dangers.

 

If a company knows that the product may be dangerous if misused and improper use is foreseeable, companies must warn against such use and the dangers involved.

 

Failure to adequately warn leads to a failure to warn of the defect.

 

Some uses only became foreseeable to companies once the product entered the market. It is likely that when we bring a failure to warn claim, we bring you the justice you deserve and save others from pain and suffering.

 

     For Example, Bowls are not all microwave-safe, so a warning against misuse is given.

 

There may also be warranty issues that can offer recovery under Sales Law. (Sales Law is a subset of contract law, but you can still recover for some injuries if successful)

 

 Express Warranties: This warranty is created by giving: Affirmations of fact, promises, descriptions, samples, or models, if any of these become “part of the basis of the bargain.”

 

Implied Warranty of Merchantability: This warranty occurs when the seller is a merchant who deals in goods of the kind being sold. This warranty includes used goods as well.

 

There are two implied promises in this warranty:

 

1. Goods fit for ordinary purposes.

 

2. Goods go without objection in trade.

 

Implied Warranty of Fitness for Purpose: This warranty occurs when the seller has reason to know the buyer’s particular purchasing purpose. And the buyer relied on the seller’s skill or judgment to select the goods they bought.

These claims do not only have to be brought against the wrongdoer. The claim can hold their employer liable as well.

 

Respondeat superior: This is a way to hold an employer or company responsible for the actions of another (“vicariously liable”). Suppose the company’s representative acted within the scope of their duties when the injury
occurred. In that case, the employer is liable too.

 

This rule takes an excellent legal argument because the other side will try to argue that their representative was on a “frolic.”

 

A frolic is a departure from the scope of their duties, and therefore the employer would not be liable.

 

The employer is usually the only party with the finances and sufficient insurance to bring justice to injured individuals. It is of the utmost importance not to lose this legal argument if there is a path to victory.

Damages would include any financial loss or damage to your reputation that results from the claim.

 

“Damages” in this context mean what you may be able to get from bringing this type of lawsuit.

 

General Damages (Economic Damages): These are Damages that an attorney does not need to specially plead because they are usually suffered by the type of injury sustained. A characteristic of these Damages is that they are easier to quantify because they are not subjective.

 

Loss of Income earning ability (known as lost wages):

 

The injured person would have made money through employment if not injured.

 

As the name suggests, these damages also apply to the loss of income-earning ability.

 

Suppose the injured party took a lesser-paying job due to their injuries.

 

The amount recoverable is the difference between wages before the injury and now.

 

These wages are measured from the time of the injury to the time of settlement or jury decision.

 

Future wages:

 

If the injured person could never do the same job they had before the injury, the decrease in pay will be permanent. The injured party may be entitled to the wages they would have earned in the future at the job they had before the injury.

 

Furthermore, this recovery is for any quantifiable decrease in the injured person’s financial situation due to employment changes.

 

For Example:

 

Commissions and bonuses.

 

Any change in benefits.

 

Promotion or raises missed due to the injury.

 

Medical costs:

 

These costs will be for past and future medical expenses.

 

Based on the injury, the injured will need future medical attention. Because the costs are the fault of the liable (this is the civil court equivalent of saying “guilty” in a criminal case) party, that party will be held responsible for these costs.

 

Special Damages (Non-Economic Damages):

 

These types of injuries are hard to prove. An attorney must specially plead them because they must be more apparent to third parties.

 

Mental anguish (Emotional distress) (this is the mental effects that came about due to the injury):

 

The injured party may recover due to past and future mental anguish caused by the injury.

 

Though this type of injury may be the most devastating, these injuries may not always be recoverable.

 

The ability to recover from these injuries is very situation specific. It requires a personal injury attorney who knows the law and case law developments. A competent attorney can fight against insurance companies because insurance companies rarely want to give anything significant for mental anguish.

 

Pain and suffering:

 

These types of Damages allow recovery for the injured person for the pain and suffering that the injury caused.

 

Because this injury is personal, it is often hard for others to understand and believe the pain and suffering the injured person went through or is going through.

 

Proving the pain and suffering is a sell; either the other side will buy in and believe the injured party, or they will not.

 

Physical impairment (Loss of enjoyment of life):

 

This type of Damage may be recoverable if you had an activity you used to do and now can no longer do due to your physical limitations.

 

Loss of consortium:

 

Spousal:

 

If the injury was so severe as to affect your relationship with your spouse, YOUR SPOUSE MIGHT BE ABLE TO RECOVER under this type of Damage. This type of recovery would be from a separate claim filed by your spouse.

 

Children:

 

A CHILD COULD SUE SEPARATELY AND CLAIM THIS TYPE OF DAMAGE if their parent’s injury affected the parent’s role in the child’s life.

 

Disfigurement:

 

This type of recovery may be allowed when the injury has physically changed your body.

 

This type of Damage can be for past and future disfigurement.

 

Any other non-financial harm reasonably associated with the injuries may be recoverable.

 

Exemplary Damages (Punitive Damages):

 

To get exemplary Damages, the person looking for these Damages must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the injury is the result of either:

 

(1) Fraud.

Fraud: Occurs when a person misrepresents something essential to the bargain while knowing the misrepresentation is false, and the person being lied to is justified in their belief of the lie. And the lie caused Damages.

 

(2) Malice.

Malice: Is a specific intent to inflict substantial harm.

 

(3) Gross negligence.

Gross negligence: This is an act or omission, which a reasonable person in the wrongdoer’s shoes should have known of the extreme risk due to the probability of significant harm, and the wrongdoer knew of the risk and consciously disregarded the risk.

 

Unless these Damages are looked for under a statute that authorizes them, then clear and convincing evidence must show the matters and mental state of the statute conditions.

 

The jury must receive instructions on these Damages and be unanimous in their desire to award such Damages.

 

Clear and convincing: Proof would impart a “firm belief or conviction” if the evidence was presented to a reasonable person.

shield
The Law Is Our Shield

There are many defenses to personal injury and other tort cases, but not all will pertain to all injuries.

For Example:

 Consent: The person suing allowed the harm to occur or the actions that led to the injury. The victim can give consent expressly (orally or written) or implied (by actions). Consent has other considerations that can waive the defense based on the circumstances or capacity of the victim.

 

Self-defense: If you reasonably believed that you were in danger and reasonably defended yourself, you may have a valid defense against civil liability. The defense will hinge on whether your belief in the defense and the force used were reasonable. Reasonableness will be decided using an objective standard.

 

Defense of others: If you reasonably believed that someone else was in danger and reasonably defended them, you may have a valid defense against civil liability. The defense will hinge on whether your belief in the defense and the force used were reasonable. Reasonableness will be decided using an objective standard.

 

Defense of your property: If you reasonably believed that your property was in danger and you reasonably defended it, you may have a valid defense against civil liability. The defense will hinge on whether your belief in the defense and the force used were reasonable. Reasonableness will be decided using an objective standard.

 

Defense of another’s property: If you reasonably believed another’s property was in danger and reasonably defended it, you may have a valid defense against civil liability. The defense will hinge on whether your belief in the defense and the force used were reasonable. Reasonableness will be decided using an objective standard.

 

Shopkeeper privilege: Business owners have a right to detain you to investigate a theft.

 

Comparative Negligence: Texas is a modified comparative negligent state. In Texas, you can sue for Damages only if you are not more than 50% to blame for your injuries.

 

Assumption of the risk: Plaintiff (the person suing) was aware of the risk and voluntarily assumed it. This defense would follow the rules of consent. This defense is no longer valid in Texas.

 

Absolute privilege: Certain positions allow people to act in a way that would otherwise be an actionable tort (a civil action due to harm) and not be held liable for injury caused.

 

Truth: Truth is a defense concerning defamation torts; the claim is not actionable if the statement is the truth.

 

Qualified privilege: This is like an absolute privilege but is limited in scope. In other words, it is only a protection for certain torts done for a set of particular circumstances.

How to deal with insurance companies:

 

People get insurance to cover harm caused to others and themselves, and we all usually have insurance.

Most of us have the impression that insurance companies are in business to help when unexpected expenses arise or tragedies happen, but that is not the purpose of insurance companies.

 

The purpose of insurance companies is to make money, like any other business.

 

So, the less money the insurance pays out, the more money they make. That is only common sense.

 

No matter how nice the person representing the insurance company is, or if you have already dealt with the insurance company and think they are the exception and care for their clients. The insurance company’s primary goal is to find a way not to pay your claim, with few exceptions.

 

Some insurance companies rely on scare tactics and threats to make you think you must settle or force you to pay out of pocket.

 

Follow these rules when dealing with insurance companies:

 

  • Contact an attorney first when you need to call an insurance company due to an injury, wrongful death, or property damage.
  •  If the insurance company calls you, tell them you have nothing to say before finding legal representation.
  • Contact an attorney and tell them that the insurance company called you.
  • Never give the insurance company any requested information or document without consulting an attorney.
  • Only accept the offer or settlement the insurance company offers after consulting an attorney.
  • Call an attorney immediately if your insurance company says you must pay out of pocket.

 

Calling an attorney is always possible, even if you have already talked to an insurance company.

           

Attorneys are legally obligated to put your interest above all else in matters involving you.

           

Insurance representatives who are contacting you are professional negotiators.

The above information is just part of the puzzle. A competent attorney must consider all this and more in personal injury cases.

It is said sunshine is the best disinfectant, which the law does. It shines the light on dangerous items, situations, and people.

Legal disputes are the primary way companies and individuals learn from their mistakes.

Legal disputes make the world safer for the next person while at the same time getting you the justice you deserve.

I assure you that this firm will take this type of claim personally because we treasure your justice, and we could save the next person from harm or death.

Your Justice Awaits. This Firm Will Be Your Champion And Fight For Your Family’s Honor.

We Will Get It Done.

Standing watch